| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
- augmented cognition (34)
- behavioral economics (4)
- bionics (17)
- collective intelligence (24)
- fun (29)
- games and simulations (20)
- innovation (18)
- learning theory (30)
- mathematics (6)
- mobile computing (24)
- neuroscience (52)
- pervasive computing (25)
- psychology (13)
- science (38)
- scifi (8)
- social media (6)
- social networks (32)
- software (33)
- Uncategorized (28)
- user-created content (6)
- work (18)
- July 15, 2010: Electrical Fields Influence Brain Activity
- July 15, 2010: Brain fitness program improve visual memory in older adults
- July 13, 2010: P7C3 Drug Grows Brain Cells
- June 16, 2010: Experience shapes the brain's circuitry throughout adulthood
- May 12, 2010: Are Athletes Geniuses?
- May 12, 2010: Magnetically Induced Hallucinations
- May 6, 2010: Creating the Internet of Things
- May 3, 2010: Big Changes for TV on the Horizon
- May 3, 2010: Soldier Brain Mods
- April 9, 2010: Jane McGonigal on Gaming for a Better World
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- August 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
Influence in Traditional Social Networks
While Facebook, MySpace and other social networking sites continue to receive a lot of attention, the real influence may lie within traditional social networks [washington post]:
When researchers analyzed the patterns of those who managed to quit smoking over the 32-year period, they found that the decision appeared to be highly influenced by whether someone close to them stopped. A person whose spouse quit was 67 percent more likely to kick the habit. If a friend gave it up, a person was 36 percent more likely to do so. If a sibling quit, the chances increased by 25 percent.
A co-worker had an influence — 34 percent — only if the smoker worked at a small firm. The effects were stronger among the more educated and among those who were casual or moderate smokers. Neighbors did not appear to influence each other, but friends did even if they lived far away.
“You appear to have to have a close relationship with the person for it to be influential,” Fowler said.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.